Lesson Plan

MYTHS

Myths

Cross Age Tutoring / Multiple Intelligences Lesson Plan

Myths: Literature, Brazil, Mapping, and Cultural Research

Suggested grades: 2–5   Subjects: Literature, Geography, Research, Writing, Art   Time: 3–4 sessions

The original lesson uses How Night Came to Be and connects the story with Brazil. Because myths are literary and cultural traditions rather than scientific explanations, students should distinguish the story's imaginative account from scientific explanations of day and night.

Learning Objectives

  • Retell and analyze a myth as a literary or traditional narrative.
  • Locate Brazil using maps and identify its position in South America.
  • Distinguish cultural information supported by a source from generalized assumptions.
  • Create a new retelling while clearly identifying it as creative writing.

Procedure

  1. Read: Read the selected story. Identify characters, setting, problem, sequence, and explanation offered by the story.
  2. Reality check: Discuss the difference between a traditional story's explanation and the scientific explanation of Earth's rotation and daylight.
  3. Map: Locate Brazil, neighboring countries, the Atlantic Ocean, and major geographic features appropriate to the grade.
  4. Research: Students investigate one specific Brazilian region, community, food, animal, or geographic feature using a teacher-approved source. Do not present Brazil as a single uniform culture.
  5. Retelling: Students write a new version of the story or a “what if” retelling. Label it as fiction.
  6. Art: Create a map, illustration, or story sequence. Cultural images should come from the story or documented research rather than stereotypes.

Assessment

Students retell the story accurately, identify Brazil on a map, and provide at least two source-supported facts. Older students explain why a myth and a scientific explanation serve different purposes.

Extension

Compare the story with another traditional explanation of a natural phenomenon, emphasizing similarities and differences in narrative structure rather than judging the traditions.